The B***Sh*t Continues & Grows, The B***Sh*t Reads - Will Junk Science Rule Over Tested and Proven Science?

Will Junk Science Rule Over Tested and Proven Science?

9 hrs ago from Illinois Review
By Nancy Thorner -

Insight into the world of the far left on global warming (aka, climate change), isn't pretty. Rhetoric has become even more strident as momentum continues to build for the U.S. to develop a comprehensive climate policy for the first time since 2010. Activists intent on advancing man made global warming as undisputed fact are on the alert and head the firing line as they confront and seek to destroy global warming skeptics who managed to derail global warming legislation in the past.

The Left believes it has the momentum on climate change. Why is this? Has the Left found hope in President Obama's post/election campaign stops as he crisscrosses the U.S. where his talk is of climate change? But will Obama's politicking be enough to remove the obstacles global warming activists will likely face from legislators in the current House and Senate? Furthermore, how detrimental was it to the Left when in 2008 Al Gore (lying c**t) was hailed as their chief spokesperson in what was thought to a major advantage with an assured "victory", but which didn't pan out? (Because there's no war, just science. The connection between politics and science should be destroyed, there two complete different fields of study, STOP FORCING THEM TOGETHER - Editor - Damion Hampton.)

There are two very plain signs among climate change advocates that speak to confidence in their mission to "force" climate change and its devastating resultant policies upon the American people:

1) Alarmists refuse to acknowledge the existence of Climate Change (there are no alarmists in cooling and real science - your the f**king alarmists telling the world they'll die in huge storms and flooding. We just present reality, science and let people make up their own minds - Editor - Damion Hampton - don't bring your failed b***sh*t into the world of real science.) Reconsidered,which they would acknowledge and try to rebut if it was really about the science. Climate Change Reconsidered is an 880-page rebuttal of the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that was three years in the making. It was released in June 2009 by The Heartland Institute based in Chicago, Illinois. It provides an independent examination of the "evidence" available on the causes and consequences of climate change in the published, peer-reviewed literature examined without bias and selectivity...